Should a seller carried note cover the land only, or package the barn into it too
Take 18 acres in eastern tennessee, free and clear, with a small barn built out about four years ago. Bought in 2021 at 142k, and a buyer now wants to carry at 185k with 25k down on a 7 year amortization at 6.5 percent. Say the terms themselves are acceptable. The structural question is whether to write the note against the whole 18 acres plus the barn as one collateral package, or against the land alone and handle the barn separately, maybe as personal property, maybe absorbed into the land value without being called out at all. The argument against bundling is what a default looks like. The seller ends up foreclosing on a barn somebody has used hard for four or five years, worth well under what the note price implies. Land holds value and the barn depreciates. The argument for bundling is simplicity, since splitting puts two instruments on one purchase and most buyers expect one. And the gap between the 142k paid and the 185k offered is partly the barn, so pretending it is not there does not survive contact with the numbers. How does the room usually structure this one?