Whether a conversion deal that needs historic tax credits should be structured before or after the credit allocation is confirmed
A deal to study: a 1930s former department store, 28,000 square feet, acquisition at $42 a foot, hard cost estimate of $110 a foot to convert to 24 apartments plus ground-floor retail. The developer pursues a Part 2 certification from the state historic preservation office and expects a 20 percent federal historic tax credit on qualified rehabilitation expenditures. The credit equity, priced at roughly $0.88 on the dollar by the syndicator, is supposed to cover $550,000 of the $3.1 million project cost. The GP structures the deal first, closes on the building, and starts spending on drawings before the credit allocation is in hand.
The allocation comes back with a reduced qualified rehabilitation expenditure figure because the SHPO objects to two interior modifications the architect already drew. Redesign costs nine weeks and $34,000. The credit equity drops from $550,000 to $410,000. The GP now has a $140,000 gap in a deal that was already thin on contingency, a lender who priced the loan on the original stack, and a syndicator whose investment committee wants a revised carve-out agreement before they will proceed.
The alternative structure is a longer contract with the seller, a feasibility period sized to get through at minimum a conditional Part 2 approval, and a capital stack that treats the credit equity as upside rather than as a load-bearing piece. That costs more carry on the front end and some sellers will not agree to it. But the gap that opened up in the example above appeared because the credit was modeled as certain before it was confirmed, and the GP had already spent money and time on work that had to be redone.
The specific question worth settling: at what point in the credit review process is it reasonable to treat the equity figure as firm enough to close on the building and start spending? Conditional Part 2, final Part 2, or only after the syndicator countersigns?