Cash rent versus crop share for a first farmland lease
For an owner nine months from closing on a first piece of farmland, somewhere between 80 and 120 tillable acres, the lease decision usually comes down to cash rent against crop share. Cash rent means the operator pays a fixed dollar amount per acre for the year and keeps the upside and downside of the crop. Crop share means the harvest, and often the input costs, gets split by an agreed percentage, so the owner takes on part of the weather and part of the price swing. Cash rent is the version most new owners understand: a known number to plan around, typically landing in that modest 2 to 5 percent income return band. Crop share can pay more in a strong year and very little in a weak one, and it requires tracking grain prices and input bills rather than depositing a fixed check. The case for share is that in a year when commodity prices firm up and input costs ease, a cash rent tenant keeps all of that gain while the owner keeps the same number agreed to months earlier. Net farm income can move a great deal in a single cycle, and none of that reaches a cash rent landlord. The case against share, and the real risk for a first time owner, is taking on farming risk without farming knowledge. A reasonable middle path for someone new to the asset is to start in cash rent for the first year or two, learn the ground and the operator, and revisit crop share once there is enough understanding to evaluate the terms.
For a first farm purchase, which lease structure?
23 votes