If the plan is only two rentals, does BRRRR still apply?
The letters stand for buy, rehab, rent, refinance, repeat, and the last R is the engine of the method. Pulling money back out at the refinance and redeploying it into the next purchase is how an investor scales from one house to eight without new savings. But plenty of operators aren't trying to get to eight. Two or three good rentals, held a long time, is a complete and reasonable plan on its own. For that investor, the refinance is no longer about funding the next purchase. It becomes a question of converting a short-term rehab loan into permanent financing, and how much of the original cash to pull back out along the way. One view holds that without the repeat, this is simply buying a fixer, renovating it, and holding it, a strategy that predates the acronym and doesn't need one. The other view holds that the discipline of the method is the valuable part regardless of how many times it's run, because it forces rent and refinance underwriting before the purchase happens, which is good practice at any scale. The stronger case is for the second view: the underwriting discipline is the actual value, and it doesn't depend on repetition to be worth using.
Without the repeat, is it still worth calling it BRRRR?
17 votes