Reserve line on a five room co-living house, per room, per square foot, or a slice of gross
Re-underwriting room rented houses tends to expose the reserve line as the softest number in the whole model. Rent, taxes, and insurance can be defended within a few hundred dollars. Reserves are often just a convention rather than a calculation. Take a concrete example: 1,900 square feet, five rooms, gross 3,700 a month at full occupancy. At 8% of gross that holds $296 a month. At $65 per occupied room per month that holds $325. At $1.25 per square foot per year on the structure that holds $198. That spread is over $1,500 a year, a real chunk of levered return on a house this size. The case for per room: wear is people driven. Five adults with five schedules put five times the load on one kitchen and two showers, and turn frequency scales with headcount rather than building size. Room turns, paint, door hardware, furniture replacement all track bodies. The case for per square foot: the expensive items don't care how many people live there. Roof, siding, HVAC systems, water heater, sewer lateral all cost the same whether one family or five strangers occupy the house, and a percent of gross convention can badly underfund that in a high rent market and overfund it in a cheap one. A blended number applied uniformly across a portfolio is likely wrong in both directions on different houses, which argues for matching the reserve method to what's actually driving wear on each property rather than picking one convention for everything.
How do you set the capex and turn reserve on a room-rented single family house?
30 votes