Where the first 20 hours of corporate tenant sourcing should actually go

Question

A single furnished lease that comes from a chance conversation is not a repeatable sourcing strategy, and the deliberate version of corporate tenant sourcing splits into four channels that lead to genuinely different businesses. Relocation firm and provider vendor applications carry the most volume behind them. They also mean paperwork, insurance requirements, net 45 payment terms, and sometimes a minimum operating history before approval. Long lead time, and their rate card sets the ceiling on price. Direct outreach to local employers, HR, facilities, project managers, plant coordinators, is slow, cold, and mostly ignored, but when it lands it produces the full rate and a direct relationship, concentrated in one or two contacts who could change jobs next quarter. Furnished marketplaces and syndicated listings are fast, cheap, and visible immediately. The inquiries skew toward individuals rather than companies, which means competing on price and handling more of the screening directly, and the true corporate buyer may never look there at all. Master leasing the unit to a corporate housing provider removes sourcing entirely. They pay a fixed number, usually 20 to 30 percent under direct market rate, and take on vacancy and operations, at the cost of learning nothing about actual demand. For a first year, a metro market generally rewards starting with relocation firm applications given the volume behind that channel, while a market with only one or two large employers is usually better served starting with direct outreach to those specific employers, since the relocation channel has little volume to offer there anyway.

laurenkim53 · Answer

In a small market, three of your four channels do not exist. There is no relocation firm placing people in a county of 14,000, and no provider is going to master lease a house two hours from anywhere. What is left is the employer directly, and there are usually two or three of them, and they all already have a housing problem they are solving badly with a motel on the highway. So in that setting the answer is not close. Direct outreach, and the concentration risk everyone worries about is simply what the market is. If the hospital or the plant stops sending people, there is no channel that saves you. The marketplace option deserves a different framing, though. In a thin market the listing sites are still where the individual travelers find you, and those people are the backfill between corporate stays. That is worth an hour a month even if no company ever books through it.

Where the first 20 hours of corporate tenant sourcing should actually go

1 reply