The REO purchase where a missed winterization check cost more than the entire rehab budget: a case worth studying

A small two unit REO purchase makes a useful case study on the cost of skipping one specific check. Bought at $148,000 in a market where comparable duplexes traded around $205,000, with a rehab plan of $30,000 aimed at a refinance and hold. The walkthrough happens in October, utilities off, which is standard for REO, listing carrying the usual as is language. The roof, electrical panel, unit layouts, kitchens, and flooring all get priced. What often does not get asked is when the property was winterized, or whether it ever was. In this case it hadn't been. The prior winter, vacant, heat off, water lines full. The plumber discovers it in week two of the rehab when pressurizing the system sends water through three ceilings: split supply lines on both floors, a cracked distribution manifold on the boiler, and a hairline crack in the cast iron waste stack that had only been holding because nothing had run through it. Plumbing rough in, boiler work, and drywall and paint that had already been paid for once come to $41,000 against a $30,000 budget on the plumbing line alone, pushing total spend to $62,000. $148,000 plus $62,000 is $210,000 into a building worth about $205,000. The refinance appraises at $201,000, leaving roughly $34,000 more cash in the deal than planned, capital that was supposed to fund the next purchase and instead sits tied up for a year. The fix is a $350 line item: ask the listing agent in writing for the winterization record and the date utilities were shut off, and if none exists, pay a plumber to air test the supply lines before releasing the inspection contingency. A dry system with utilities off can absolutely still be tested, with air rather than water, and skipping that step on the assumption that a dry system cannot be checked is the actual mistake in this case, not the lack of heat itself.

1 reply

mikeoconnell7 SO3CPRO 12

The air test is the right lesson and it is cheap enough that nobody should skip it. One thing to add to your list. Ask for the full property preservation history. The winterization sticker on its own proves very little. Servicers order inspections and preservation work through vendors, and there is usually a file with dates for the initial secure, the winterization if it happened, and any reactivation for a prior showing. Sometimes the listing agent can get a summary, sometimes they cannot, and either answer tells you something. A property that was winterized, then de-winterized for someone else's inspection and never redone, is the exact case that produces your three ceilings, because the sticker on the water heater says it was handled. On the cause, a gentle push back on framing this as a plumbing miss. You bought at 148k against 205k, which is a 57k spread, and you planned 30k of work with no real contingency on a vacant 2-unit that had been through a winter with the heat off. Even without the freeze you were one bad boiler away from break even. The air test would have saved you this time. A contingency line would have saved you every time. And for what it is worth, you own a renting duplex at 210k that is worth 205k, which in a couple of years of rent is a slow recovery rather than a hole.

mikeoconnell7 SO3CPRO 12

The REO purchase where a missed winterization check cost more than the entire rehab budget: a case worth studying

1 reply