A $3,500 minimum on a $48k house is 7 percent, so nobody will work with me
Buying in a rural county where the houses I want are $38k to $72k. Rents run $675 to $850 and they hold, tenancies here average longer than anything I've seen in a metro. The math is fine. Getting anyone to transact is not.
Every brokerage within 40 miles has a minimum commission, most around $3,000 to $3,500. On a $48k purchase that's over 7%, and post-settlement the seller side offering compensation is no longer something I can assume, so on a lot of these I'm paying it out of pocket on top of my down payment. Three deals last year I paid $3,500 each on purchases of $44k, $51k, and $62k. That's $10,500 against about $157k of purchases.
Add that the two agents who'll actually drive out here are doing me a favor and both have told me plainly that a $48k closing pays them a few hundred dollars after the split and the desk fee, so they take it once and then they're busy.
What I have: a decent list of owners from the assessor rolls, mostly out of county heirs. What I'm weighing is three options. Pay the minimum and treat it as a cost of doing business, which at $3,500 a deal is roughly 5 months of net cash flow per house. Get licensed myself, which means a brokerage split, continuing education, and disclosure on both sides of every deal I do. Or go direct to sellers with an attorney handling the paperwork, which in this state is normal for closings anyway.
I keep landing on getting licensed and then talking myself out of it because I don't want to be an agent, I want to own houses. Anyone actually done the third one at volume in a low price market?