A 5 acre parcel with no road frontage where the seller says there is a dirt track
Take a 5 acre parcel owned by an out of state heir who has never seen it and wants $9k, in an area where a builder would likely pay around $25k for similar acreage. The spread looks fine on paper. The problem is the county GIS. No road line touches the boundary anywhere, and the nearest county road is maybe 400 feet away through what looks like someone's pasture. Asked about access, a seller in that position will usually say a brother used to drive in on a dirt track and "everybody used it, nobody ever said anything." Two threads on the subject contradict each other. One says prescriptive easements mean that if people have used a route long enough it becomes a legal right of way, so a landlocked parcel is not really landlocked. The other says no legal access means the land is worth close to nothing and no builder will touch it. Both cannot be how it works. Is the right move to put it under contract and let title sort it out, or is that 30 days wasted if the answer is that this one is dead?