Whether a rent to own term should run twenty four months or forty eight
Set the scenario as a buyer negotiating a rent to own on a small house, with the owner leaving the term open to proposal. The file needs about eighteen months of clean payments and a bit of collection cleanup before a lender will look at it seriously, which is the usual reason someone lands on this structure at all. A 24 month term keeps the strike price close to today's number, and an owner is far more likely to sign it. It also forces the credit work to happen instead of drifting. Miss the window and the option fee and the rent credits are gone, and 24 months leaves little cushion if one thing goes wrong with income. A 48 month term buys room to fail once and recover. The trade is that an owner asked to sit that long will want a higher strike price, and the buyer pays above market rent for four years to build credits toward a number that may or may not still make sense in 2029. There is also the risk of getting comfortable renting and never exercising. Opinions split down the middle on this one, so it is worth seeing where the room lands rather than collecting one-off answers.
What term would you sign as the tenant-buyer?
15 votes