For a client's first seller campaign, where should the budget go first
A recurring argument in real estate marketing work: where should the first dollars go for a client running a modest budget, say 1,500 to 2,500 a month all in. Search is the obvious answer because intent is already present; someone typing sell my house fast has a problem today. In competitive metros, though, click prices on those terms have moved high enough that 1,500 buys a very small number of clicks, and in a thin market the search volume may not exist at all, which can take three months to prove one way or the other. Meta delivers volume for a fraction of the click price and reaches people who have not started searching yet, which is a real part of the seller universe. The tradeoff is lead quality. Form fills sourced from an interruption channel answer the phone at a noticeably lower rate, and a client who has never worked paid leads before tends to read that gap as the campaign failing rather than as an expected feature of the channel. The option most clients resist is spending the first month or two on foundational work, the Google Business profile, site speed, tracking setup, before any media spend at all. It produces nothing visible in month one, which makes it a hard sell even when it is the right sequencing. The right allocation usually depends less on channel economics and more on how much runway the client is willing to give before expecting results, and setting that expectation up front avoids most of the friction that shows up later.
First $2,000 a month of a new seller campaign goes where?
16 votes