When two suites in the same building show a large rent gap, is it a medical premium or a stale lease
Take a small two-story building in a suburban node with a 2,100 square foot pediatric practice on one floor at $34 a square foot and a 2,000 square foot insurance agency on another at $26 a square foot, same building, same age, same parking lot. An $8 per square foot gap like that raises a real underwriting question: is that a durable medical office premium, or is the pediatric suite simply an older lease signed under different market conditions that will converge with the office rate at renewal. The way to tell the difference is to pull the lease commencement dates and compare them against when each rate was actually market. If the pediatric lease was signed years ago and simply never rolled, the gap says nothing about a medical premium and everything about lease timing, and it likely narrows at the next renewal. If the pediatric rate reflects a recent lease or renewal signed at that level, with comparable medical space in the immediate market also commanding a premium over general office, then the premium is real and the case for eventually converting the office suites to medical use strengthens the value of the whole building. On a 9,400 square foot building asking $2.35M with in-place NOI around $158k, the answer to that question changes whether the offer price reflects a real embedded upside or is simply paying for a story that will not hold at the next lease turn.