Everyone tells me a storefront under apartments is harder to finance. Harder how?

Question

I'm planning my first purchase and the shape I keep coming back to is small, four apartments over one or two commercial bays in a walkable older neighborhood. Two brokers and one loan officer have all said some version of "that's a commercial loan" and then changed the subject.

What I've been able to piece together is that once the commercial square footage or commercial income crosses some share of the building, residential lending programs stop looking at it and you're into commercial terms. Shorter term, faster amortization, possibly a personal guarantee, maybe a balloon. I understand those are different terms. What I don't understand is whether that's a reason to avoid the shape entirely as a first purchase or just a reason to plan differently.

The argument for going ahead is that the mix is the point. Four apartments with deep rental demand plus a neighborhood retail bay, and if one side has a bad year the other side is still paying. That diversification is exactly what people say makes mixed-use worth owning.

The argument against is that as a first purchase I'd be learning residential management and commercial leasing at the same time, on financing terms that give me less room, with a balloon date that doesn't care whether I've figured it out yet.

I'd rather hear people argue both sides than be told it's fine. Is the small mixed-use building a reasonable first building or a second one?

ehernandez74 · Answer

The financing thing is real and it's mostly about the percentage. Different lenders draw the line in different places for how much commercial income or commercial floor area they'll tolerate before the loan moves from a residential product to a commercial one, and it changes over time, so the only way to know is to ask three of them for it in writing before you fall for a building.

What I'd add is that the term length matters more to you than the rate. A five year term with a balloon means you have a hard date where you have to refinance or sell, and if the ground floor is empty that month your options narrow. A ten year term buys you two chances to lease the bay before anyone makes you prove anything.

I took two years deciding on my first one and I don't regret the slowness. I do regret how much of that time I spent on buildings before I'd asked a single lender what they'd actually lend on.

tylerbrooks9 · Answer

I'd do the four apartments first, honestly. Not because mixed-use is bad, I think the diversification argument holds up. It's that commercial leasing is a separate skill with its own vocabulary and you'll be negotiating your first one from a position of not knowing what's normal in your market.

If you do buy the mixed one, buy it with the bay already leased to a tenant with years left, so your first commercial lease negotiation happens when you're renewing someone rather than starting cold with a dark bay and a mortgage.

nicole_adeyemi · Answer

One thing nobody's said: check what the zoning actually requires of that ground floor. In a lot of walkable older neighborhoods those buildings sit in a district where the ground floor is required to stay commercial, so if the bay goes dark for two years you can't just make it a fifth apartment. Some jurisdictions have loosened that and some haven't, and it's a question for the planning counter, not the broker.

That cuts both ways for your decision, quill. It's a constraint on your exits. It's also part of why the retail down there has value, because supply of ground floor retail in that district is capped by the same rule.

Everyone tells me a storefront under apartments is harder to finance. Harder how?

3 replies