A case worth studying: an RV park camp host's departure exposed how much labor the role actually covered

Take a 40 site RV park, mostly nightly stays, run with one live-on-site camp host receiving a free full hookup site plus $1,400 a month. On paper the role covered cleaning two bathhouses, meeting arrivals, and handling the after-hours phone. When a host like that gives notice, replacing the role often reveals far more than the job description suggested. In a case like this, running the position personally for several weeks might turn up: two bathhouse cleans a day at peak rather than one, escorting roughly half of arrivals to their site because back-loop numbering is confusing, chasing generator use after 10pm, selling firewood that was never tracked separately and turns out to run about $6,400 a season at nearly all margin, running the laundry coin box, and resolving a guest dispute roughly weekly. Replacing that single role with two people at $1,400 each plus one site runs about $2,800 a month plus lost site revenue of roughly $1,600 a month in peak season, taking a labor line from $1,400 to roughly $4,400 in season, about $13k over a season that was never budgeted for it. The lesson generalizes well beyond this example: document what a role actually does, task by task with time estimates, while the person doing it is still there, rather than pricing the position at what someone will accept instead of what the underlying work costs. A position that bundles 55 hours a week of hospitality labor into a $1,400 stipend and a site is not sustainable, and the gap tends to surface as a matter of when rather than whether.

1 reply

tylerbrooks9 AO1APRO 10

The firewood number is the one worth rereading. 6,400 a season at almost all margin, running through a person paid 1,400 a month and never tracked as its own line. If she had been the type to put some of that in her pocket, nobody would have known, and that is a knock on the system rather than on her. The back loop numbering is the same kind of thing. A person was paid to walk half the arrivals to their sites every day for years because signage would have cost a few hundred dollars once. The exercise worth doing now is a list of every task the host performs that exists only because something on the property is confusing or broken, with the cost of fixing each one priced against the labor it eats. That is the version of a park worth owning, where the property works on its own and the host is pleasant rather than load bearing.

tylerbrooks9 AO1APRO 10

A case worth studying: an RV park camp host's departure exposed how much labor the role actually covered

1 reply