The second photo shoot happened because the first one was taken in the rain

There is a listing worth following for what its marketing did while it sat. It went live in March with fourteen photos that were clearly shot in bad weather. Flat gray sky, standing water on the walk, and every interior with the lamps on so the rooms read yellow against the windows. The exterior wide shot showed a wet dark roof, which makes a perfectly sound roof look like it is failing. It sat. First price cut at day 32, no new photos. Second cut at day 61, and three days after that the whole set was replaced. New shooter, blue sky, grass green, the same living room now reading as bright instead of dim. A video walkthrough with the agent talking was added, along with a 3D tour that had not been there before. The interesting part is that the photo count came down, twenty eight to nineteen. The new set dropped the awkward hallway and the mechanical room and the shot of the neighbor's fence. The old set had tried to show everything. It went pending eleven days after the reshoot. Nobody can honestly say the reshoot did it, since two price cuts came first and spring arrived in between. What the sequence does suggest is that the first set cost that seller something, because buyers who skip a house in March rarely come back to it until something visible changes, and by the time this one changed the price had already moved twice.