Working through whether $8,400 an acre pencils on cash rented farmland
A live scenario worth working through: 240 tillable acres in a corn and soy county listed at 8,400 an acre, well above a regional cropland average closer to 5,830. The seller's case for the premium is soil productivity in the top band for the county plus documented tile dating back to 2009. On the income side, say the current tenant pays 305 an acre cash rent on a one year lease that rolls annually, eleven years in place. Property tax runs 41 an acre. A farm manager fee at 6% of gross to handle the lease, tenant relationship and reporting leaves roughly 245 an acre net, which is about 2.9% on the purchase price before any appreciation. Paying all cash removes financing risk, and it's worth noting that at current farm loan rates the spread on borrowed capital in a case like this is often negative. A solar option letter frequently gets waved around in these situations, something like 1,100 an acre per year if a project gets built. When the option is unsigned and the interconnection timeline is entirely queue-dependent, it shouldn't be underwritten as income. An alternative often on the table is a larger, cheaper parcel, say 400 acres at 4,900 an acre with only 180 tillable and the rest uncruised pasture and hardwood. That pencils closer to 3.6% on the tillable portion alone, with real uncertainty on the value of the rest. The core question in cases like this is whether the premium buys genuine soil quality or simply reflects the previous buyer's optimism. Income investors chasing farmland without leverage should treat anything near 2.9% as closer to a savings account with weeds than a return worth the illiquidity.