Is scouting actually the cheapest way in, or just the cheapest way to be busy
Notes and paper still confuse me most of the time, and bird dogging keeps getting recommended to me as the place to start because it needs no capital. I want to test that claim before I spend a season on it.
The case for it being the real entry point: you can't lose money you haven't put in. No contract, no title, no earnest money. You learn to recognize a distressed property with your own eyes, which is the skill everything else sits on, and you meet active buyers while doing it. That's an apprenticeship, and apprenticeships have always been how people learn trades.
The case against: no capital doesn't mean no cost. It's gas, hours, subscriptions, and months where nothing pays. Someone here mentioned $611 spent before understanding what a lead even was. And the thing you're learning is how to spot a house, which isn't the same skill as underwriting one. I could spend six months learning to notice tarps and still have no idea what to pay for the house.
The alternative version is that a beginner should skip straight to reading deals, studying comps and getting numbers wrong on paper where it's free, rather than driving around collecting addresses.
Both arguments sound right to me, which usually means I'm missing the distinction between them.
For a true beginner with no capital, which comes first?
27 votes