When a rent roll doesn't match the leases, whose job is it to catch that
Take a package on a four-plex where the listing sheet shows $3,400 a month gross, but the actual leases add up to $3,050, and one of the four units is month-to-month with no written lease at all, just a note that the tenant pays $700. A listing agent presenting the $3,400 figure as market rent rather than actual rent is common practice on the seller side, but sending it to a buyer without flagging the gap between market and actual is a different thing. An investor-focused buyer's agent should be catching that discrepancy before it reaches the client, pulling every lease, reconciling the rent roll line by line, and flagging any unit without a written lease as a real risk item, not a footnote. What's reasonably the agent's job versus the buyer's own diligence comes down to representation: an agent working for the buyer owes that reconciliation as a baseline service, while a buyer working with a seller's agent or no agent at all should assume nobody is checking it for them.