Do you need to see a house before agreeing to move someone's dispo contract
Say a wholesaler sends over a single family contract and asks for help finding a buyer, complete with 22 photos, a walkthrough video, and a repair estimate, for a property well outside a normal driving radius. The case for going to look: whoever is describing the property to a cash buyer has their name on that description, and photos can hide water stains, sloped floors, or a difficult neighbor. Get it wrong twice and buyers stop opening the texts. The case against: speed is the entire point of the dispo side. A two hour round trip before the first message goes out is a real cost when the fastest deals capture the best fees, and plenty of buyers on a good list are contractors or flippers sending their own inspector regardless. They often just need the address and the price, not an opinion on the roof. In practice this tends to split by source. A deal sourced personally usually earns an in-person look before it goes to a buyer list, while a deal handed over with strong photo and video documentation from a trusted source can move on that documentation alone, provided the buyer pool is sophisticated enough to do its own diligence.
Before you send someone else's contract to your buyers, do you go look at the property?
31 votes