Coach with a big portfolio versus coach who is good at teaching, which one would you pay
Sat through two intro calls this week for the same price band, roughly $4k for six months of group coaching plus office hours.
The first guy owns a real portfolio, small multifamily, been at it fifteen years, clearly knows what a bad basement smells like. He was also hard to follow. He answered questions by telling a story about a deal he did in 2013 and I couldn't extract the rule from the story. When someone asked how he underwrites vacancy he said it depends on the street, which is probably true and completely useless to me right now.
The second one has a much smaller portfolio, four doors, and said so up front. But she taught. She took a question about vacancy and put a number on the screen, showed where she got it, showed what happens to the deal at two other numbers, and asked the person to say back what they'd do differently. I understood everything she said. My worry is that in eighteen months I'll be asking questions she's never had to answer because she hasn't been through a real problem tenant or a lender pulling out at the last minute.
The cases seem symmetrical to me. Big portfolio means the answers exist somewhere in the room and I have to dig them out. Good teacher means I learn fast up to the edge of what she knows. I have no idea which failure hurts more when it's my money in a deal.
Curious which way this room breaks and why.
Same price, six months. Who do you buy
13 votes