Renewed a 48,000 sf tenant 22 months early, gave up rate, took the roof off my own balance sheet
I've owned a 48,000 square foot single tenant distribution building since 2016. Third generation family distributor, 28 foot clear, seven docks, decent yard. Lease was running to late 2027 at $5.95/sf flat, which was well under the $8.50 to $9.00 the submarket was quoting for comparable space.
Last spring the tenant's CFO called about racking. That call told me two things: they were spending money in my building, and they were thinking about time horizons. So I opened a blend and extend instead of waiting for 2027.
Where we landed. New 10 year term starting immediately, rent at $7.80/sf with 3.25 percent annual bumps, one month free at commencement, and the tenant took over roof maintenance below a $15,000 per occurrence threshold with me carrying replacement. In exchange, I replaced the roof up front, a full tear-off and 60 mil TPO with new insulation, $412,000, which is $8.58 a foot.
So I gave up rate against market (I could have chased $8.75 in 2027 with the building possibly dark for six months first) and I spent $412,000 in year one. What I got: rent went from $285,600 to $374,400 immediately, the bumps compound to about $10.60 by year 10, and my rollover risk moved from 2027 to 2035. Both my lender and an appraiser treat 10 years of term on a credit-ish local tenant very differently from 22 months of term.
The part that nearly broke it: my first roof number was an overlay at $214,000, and the tenant's insurer wanted documentation on the existing deck and saturated insulation that the overlay wouldn't address. Going to a tear-off nearly killed the economics until we split the difference by extending the free rent instead of cutting the rate further.
What I'd keep: negotiating term when the tenant is spending their own capital in the space, not when the lease is expiring.
Open question for the room, and it's the one I'm still unsure about. On the roof spend, should I have amortized it into the rent as a separate line rather than absorbing it and taking the higher base? I took the base rent route because it survives a sale better. Curious where people land on that.