When occupancy drops 14 points in month two of a quarter, does an interim note go out or does it wait for the quarterly?
Sponsors genuinely split on this one, so it is worth seeing where the room lands. Situation shape: a property loses a chunk of occupancy in the second month of a quarter. Not a catastrophe, not nothing. The distribution for the quarter is probably still payable but thinner. The scheduled update is not due for another seven weeks. The case for sending something inside a few days is that investors who hear bad news from the sponsor keep trusting the sponsor, and investors who hear it from a neighbor at a barbecue do not. Small bad news early costs far less than the same news at quarter end when it arrives bundled with a reduced distribution and looks like it was sat on. It also keeps the sponsor's own habits honest. The case for holding is that in month two the sponsor does not know the answer yet. They know the problem. An interim note with no resolution generates phone calls the sponsor cannot answer, and every one of those calls is a chance to say something they will be held to later. It also sets a precedent, because once one mid-quarter note about occupancy has gone out, silence at any other wobble reads as concealment. And each communication realistically wants a review pass, which costs money on a small fund. A typical LPA sets a floor on reporting and says nothing about volunteered updates, which is where the argument lives. Curious whether people split on this by investor count or by how bad the news is.
Bad but not fatal news lands mid-quarter. What goes out?
27 votes