What a preferred return actually buys the money side in a JV
Two JV term sheets can split the same way on paper and still get there by different routes. One structure gives the capital an 8% preferred return, meaning the money is paid first up to that rate before the operator sees any share of profit, and the operator takes a larger slice above it. The other has no pref at all. Everybody splits every dollar in proportion to what they put in, so a partner funding 90% gets 90% of everything from the first dollar to the last. The case for the pref is that it puts capital in line ahead of the operator's upside, so a mediocre deal still pays the money side before it pays the sponsor. The case against is that a pref accrues whether the deal earns it or not, and if it doesn't, the operator is effectively working for free and eventually stops working. The flat split is honest in a plain way, everyone wins and loses in the same proportion, and nobody is grinding toward a hurdle they can't reach. Both structures are defensible, and the right one depends more on who is bringing the operating skill and who is bringing the check than on which document looks more sophisticated. Where does the room land on which one they'd rather sign as the check writer?
As the JV capital, which structure would you sign?
25 votes