When a dispo partner wants to take the assignment and pay the wholesaler after closing, that is backwards
A structure that comes up often in JV wholesaling and deserves scrutiny. Say a wholesaler is under contract at $142,000, ARV somewhere around $215,000, maybe $30k of work by the numbers. The dispo partner says he has a buyer at $158,000, so a $16,000 spread, split 50/50. Fine so far. The proposed structure is the problem: the partner takes an assignment of the contract for $142,000, then assigns to his buyer at $158,000, and wires the wholesaler $8,000 after his closing. The wholesaler funded the $2,500 earnest money from their own account. The partner's argument is that his buyer only knows him and he does not want the wholesaler on the second assignment. Is there a version of this that pays the wholesaler at the table instead of after it?