What a landlocked parcel with no recorded access means with 14 days left on a title contingency
Take an 18 acre exurban parcel under contract at $71,000, with a title contingency and 14 days left to run. The commitment comes back with Schedule B showing the usual utility easements, an old pipeline right of way along the south line, and nothing granting access from the county road. The parcel touches the road for zero feet. Access runs across a neighbor's pasture on a dirt track that has apparently been used since the 1970s, with no recorded easement behind it. Documents an operator in that position should be pulling together: a 1978 plat showing the track as a dashed, unlabeled line, a tax map that treats the parcel as landlocked, and whatever the current neighbor will say about tolerating the crossing, keeping in mind that tolerance from one owner does not bind a future one. Prescriptive and implied easement claims exist in most states, but the standards vary enormously and turn on facts a buyer usually cannot verify before closing, so nobody should treat unrecorded historical use as settled. The realistic options are the same three every time this comes up. Ask the seller to fund a recorded easement from the neighbor before closing. Buy title insurance with the access exception carved out and accept the residual risk. Or walk and absorb the survey and commitment costs, which on a small deal like this run somewhere near $900. Making access a hard condition risks the seller relisting rather than negotiating, especially on a parcel that has already sat on market for a long stretch. The cheap lesson here is usually cheaper than closing on a landlocked tract and finding out later what an unrecorded track is actually worth.