Two land deals, opposite bets. Which is the beginner version?
I own small multifamily and I've never done a land deal, so I'm going to define the words as I understand them and someone can correct me.
Entitlement means getting the government permissions that let you build what you want, zoning changes, plat approval, environmental sign-offs. Platted means the subdivision map has been approved and recorded, so the individual lots legally exist. Unimproved means there's still no street, no pipe, no power to those lots.
Deal one. 38 acres, currently zoned for one house per five acres, seller wants $18k an acre, $684k. If it got rezoned and platted it might carry 90 lots. Cheap dirt, and every dollar of value comes from approvals I'd be trying to get for the first time.
Deal two. 14 lots already platted and recorded in a stalled subdivision, no infrastructure in, $52k a lot, $728k. Almost the same money. The approvals exist. I'd be buying the right to spend a lot more money on dirt work.
The case for deal one is that entitlement is where the biggest markup lives, and if I never learn it I'm always paying someone else for it. The case for deal two is that I can't be denied. Nobody votes on whether my lots exist, my risk moves to construction cost and to whether builders want lots there.
The case against deal one is obvious, a no vote makes the land worth what I paid or less and my money is gone. The case against deal two is less obvious to me, which worries me more, and I suspect that's where the room will split.
So I'm asking rather than arguing.
First land deal, which risk would you rather take?
9 votes