Do you underwrite the lots at retail absorption or at a bulk exit with retail as the upside case?
48 acres, ordinance supports 9 lots without a public road if I use the existing frontage and one easement, and the frontage is the constraint on how fast this moves. Comparable lot sales in that submarket run $58k to $66k and there were 11 of them in the last 18 months across three sellers, so my honest absorption is somewhere near three lots a year. Call it 36 months to clear nine.
Two ways to write this up.
Retail absorption. Nine lots at $60k, staged over 36 months, spread the selling costs, carry the taxes and the note on the unsold remainder, discount the whole stream back. I get something like a $148k present value profit on a $312k basis, and it's sensitive to almost everything. Push absorption to 24 months and it's $181k. Push it to 48 and my carry eats a third of it.
Bulk exit. A regional builder pays somewhere around 65 to 70 cents on the retail dollar for a finished nine lot plat, so call it $390k for the package, closed in one transaction shortly after the plat records. That's maybe $58k of profit and it happens in 14 months instead of 40. Then anything I get above the builder number by retailing is upside I didn't underwrite.
I can't decide which one is the number I should be making the buy decision on. The first is honest about value and dishonest about certainty. The second is the opposite. Which one governs your offer price?
Which number sets your offer price on a subdivide-and-sell?
13 votes