Do I pay for title work on a parcel before anyone has agreed to buy it
I have a contract shape figured out and now I'm stuck on sequencing. Say I get 12 acres under contract at 30k with a 30 day inspection period. Do I open title immediately and pay for it, or do I sit on my hands until I have a buyer signed at a number I like?
Argument for opening title day one: land is where the title problems live. If there's a lien, a busted description, a missing heir, or a severed interest, I want to know in week one while I still have a way out, and I don't want to find it on day 26 with a buyer already committed and expecting me to perform. It also means when I do talk to a buyer I can answer questions instead of shrugging.
Argument for waiting: a title commitment on a small parcel is real money out of pocket, and I have no fee yet. If nobody wants the tract at my number, I've paid for information about a deal that was never going to happen. Some people say the buyer's closing will produce the title work anyway, so why pay twice.
And there's a middle version I keep hearing about, where you go read the deeds and the tax records yourself first for free, then order the commitment only if the parcel looks clean and a buyer looks likely.
I don't know which of these is standard practice versus which is what people do because they're broke. Those seem like different answers.
When do you open title on a land parcel you've put under contract?
30 votes