When to pay for title work on a land parcel that has no buyer yet
Say a 12 acre parcel goes under contract at 30k with a 30 day inspection period. The sequencing question that follows is whether to open title immediately and pay for it, or wait until a buyer is signed at an acceptable number. The case for opening title day one: land is where the title problems live. A lien, a busted legal description, a missing heir, or a severed mineral or surface interest surfaces in week one, while there's still a way out, rather than on day 26 with a buyer already committed and expecting performance. It also means questions from a prospective buyer get answered instead of shrugged off. The case for waiting: a title commitment on a small parcel is real money out of pocket against no fee yet secured. If no buyer wants the tract at the target number, that's money spent on information about a deal that was never going to happen. The buyer's own closing will eventually produce title work regardless, which is the argument against paying for it twice. The middle path that tends to work best in practice: read the deeds and tax records directly first, at no cost, and order the commitment only once the parcel looks clean on that review and a buyer looks likely. That sequencing captures most of the early-warning value of title work without paying for a formal commitment on a deal that never closes.
When do you open title on a land parcel you've put under contract?
30 votes