Rent of $1,650 with $300 credited, is that credit real money or just paying above market for it
Take a listing advertised as rent-to-own. The house is priced at $240,000 with a three-year option, rent is $1,650, and $300 of each month's rent is credited toward the purchase. So 36 months is $10,800 of credit, plus $7,000 up front as the option fee, which also applies. That's $17,800 toward the price by the end, which sounds good until three comparable rentals on the same side of town come in at $1,375 to $1,450. If market rent is $1,400 and the tenant-buyer is paying $1,650, that's $250 a month extra, which over 36 months is $9,000. So of the $10,800 in credit, $9,000 is money handed over specifically to get the credit. The $7,000 option fee is real money too. The usual pitch is that the credit is how a tenant builds a down payment while renting, and on these numbers it looks more like a savings account with a bad interest rate and a penalty for moving. What is the tenant-buyer missing? Is the credit worth anything to a buyer, or is the actual value of one of these entirely in the locked price?