Permits pulled as owner-occupant or hire a licensed GC to pull them
I'm on a live-in flip where the scope has grown from a kitchen and two baths into moving a load-bearing wall and redoing the whole panel. Original plan was to pull everything as owner-builder, since most jurisdictions let an owner-occupant do that on their own residence, though what's allowed and for how long varies by state and sometimes by city, so anyone reading this needs to check their own building department.
The owner-builder route saves me a GC's markup on permit-pulled work, which on my scope is real money, and it keeps me in control of sequencing. That matters a lot when I'm living there and need the one working bathroom to stay working.
What I didn't think hard about is what the permit history looks like to a buyer's agent in two years. A stack of owner-pulled permits with inspections signed off is clean paper. A stack of owner-pulled permits where two are still open because I lost interest in the final inspection on the panel is a disclosure problem and possibly a price problem at closing.
There's also the sale-side question of who a buyer's inspector believes. I've had inspectors go noticeably harder on owner-done work, fair or not.
Hiring a GC of record on the structural and electrical would cost me maybe eight to twelve percent on that slice and buys me a licensed name on the card. On a two-year timeline where I'm doing the finish work myself anyway, I can't decide if that's insurance or waste.
Where does the room land on this when the exit is a retail sale to an owner-occupant buyer?
On a live-in flip with structural and electrical scope, who pulls the permits?
10 votes