$9,300 chasing note holders through paid search that nobody was doing
Five months, $9,300 total, 31 form fills, 4 conversations, zero notes bought. Writing it out because the failure was visible before I spent a dollar and I didn't look.
The idea was to buy seller financed first position notes direct from the people holding them, rather than through the brokers where everything is picked over. Everyone in the note world says the direct approach is where the margin is. So I hired a small agency, $1,100 a month plus $760 a month media, to run search ads against terms like sell my mortgage note and seller financed note buyer.
Step where it went wrong: the keyword research. The agency gave me a planner export showing decent volume on a phrase set, and I read the number as monthly searches in my target states. It was national, it was a broad match aggregate, and the genuinely commercial phrases were doing something like 40 to 90 searches a month across the whole country. The big note buying shops have been sitting on those terms for fifteen years with real budgets and real domain authority. My $760 a month was buying position 4 on a term nobody searches.
What that produced: mostly people who wanted to sell a structured settlement or an annuity, which is a different business, plus two people confused about their own mortgage. The four real conversations were all holders of notes on properties in rough condition with payment histories I wouldn't touch.
I don't blame the agency for the outcome, though I do blame them for handing me an export without saying out loud that the addressable search pool was tiny. That's the thing they know and I didn't.
What I'd do differently: pull the planner myself, filter to the exact states, look at exact match only, and if the monthly commercial volume can't support the deal count I need, don't run paid search at all. Note holders don't search. They get found through the county recorder and the servicers, which is where the money should have gone.