A tenant mix that looks stable on rent roll hides a referral dependency the cap rate never sees
Take a two-suite MOB: suite A is an orthopedic surgeon, suite B is the physical therapy practice whose patient volume runs almost entirely on surgical referrals from suite A. On paper, two tenants, two leases, two income streams. In practice, one tenant and a shadow. If the surgeon retires, relocates, or joins a competing system, PT occupancy follows within a lease cycle regardless of what the lease says. The building's actual credit concentration is in one physician, and the asking cap rate reflects two. How many small medical buildings get priced this way without anyone pulling the referral pattern before the LOI goes out?