The retail vacancy assumption on a small-town four over two won't sit still
This is not the first rental I planned on. I was looking at duplexes and a seller called about a two-story brick building on the main street of a town of about 6,800 people. Four apartments upstairs, two storefronts down, asking $310k.
What I have: apartments are two twos and two ones, gross $2,890 a month, all month to month, all long tenants, rents look 15% light. Storefront A is a hair salon, 1,100 sf, $650 a month gross, verbal lease, been there eleven years. Storefront B is 1,400 sf and holds the owner's own antique business, which leaves at closing. Roof was done six years ago with an invoice I've seen. Boiler is one system for the whole building and is 22 years old, which is the thing keeping me up.
My underwriting: $310k purchase, 25% down, bank quoted a five-year fixed with a 20-year amortization and told me to expect recourse. I'm confirming all of that in writing before I go further. Taxes $4,100, insurance quoted at $3,900 because of the commercial ground floor, and I put $500 a month against the boiler.
The part I'm stuck on is Storefront B. I've seen people say underwrite small-town retail at zero and treat any rent as a bonus. If I do that the deal still clears debt service on the apartments. If I put even $700 a month on it the deal looks good. But zero feels like a way of pretending I don't have a decision to make, since an empty storefront on a main street still costs heat and insurance and it looks bad from the sidewalk.
How do you handle the empty bay in a market where the comp set is four buildings?