A broker note tape versus a locally carried seller note, weighing a first note purchase
Consider an investor choosing between two paths for a first note purchase. Option one is a tape from a note broker: several performing loans, seasoned bank paper, priced somewhere in the 72 to 84 range of unpaid balance depending on the loan, a licensed servicer already collecting, and a collateral file that has already been through someone else's diligence. The buyer would pick one loan off the tape. Option two is a private seller who carried back financing when selling a small house a few years earlier. Balance around 61,000 at 8 percent, borrower paying every month, pay history tracked in a personal spreadsheet with deposit records. The seller wants out and isn't shopping it around. The case for the tape: paperwork is more likely to be complete, a servicer is already in place, and comparing several loans against each other on one tape teaches what the pricing spread is actually paying for. The case for the local note: local market knowledge, the ability to inspect the collateral directly, no broker fee between buyer and seller, and a motivated single seller who is easier to negotiate with than an institutional tape. The honest tradeoff: the local note's entire pay history rests on a private spreadsheet with no independent servicer record, while the tape's risk is not knowing what was cherry picked out of it before it was shown. Neither risk is smaller than the other, they're just different kinds of unknown, and worth pricing accordingly rather than assuming one path is inherently safer.
For a first performing note, which would you buy?
25 votes