Seasoning looks clean until you check whether any payments crossed a modification date
Twelve months of on-time payments reads well, but if a loan was modified at month four and the tape shows payment history without flagging that date, you are pricing seasoning that does not mean what you think it means. A borrower who re-performed after a modification is a different credit than one who paid clean from origination, and the discount has to reflect that. The question is whether the file even tells you a modification happened. Recorded modifications show up in title. Unrecorded ones sit in the servicing notes, if the servicer kept them, or in a letter the seller tucked into a folder somewhere. If you are buying from a small private holder who serviced it themselves, the modification might exist only as a handshake and a changed payment amount that nobody wrote down formally. What you will see is a payment history where the monthly figure shifted and the balance does not amortize the way the original note says it should. That gap is the tell. Run the stated rate against the actual payment against the remaining balance and see whether the numbers agree. When they do not, you are looking at an undisclosed modification or a payment that was partially credited, and either one changes your basis. How are you sourcing the servicing history when you buy from a private holder who self-serviced?