Which kind of demand would you rather own under a first parking lot
I'm four deals into small commercial and looking at parking for the first time, and the thing I can't settle is what kind of demand I actually want underneath a lot.
Every listing I look at sells a different story. One is a gravel lot two blocks from an arena that does almost nothing Tuesday afternoon and fills at $30 a car maybe seventy nights a year. One is a paved lot in an office district that lives on monthly contracts, meaning drivers who pay a set amount each month for a space rather than paying per visit. One sits across from a hospital where staff, patients and visitors come in shifts around the clock. One is a park-and-ride style lot near a commuter rail stop.
The event lot has the loudest revenue per space on its good nights, and the price per space to buy is lower because the lot is empty most of the week. The office lot is predictable and I can count the contracts, though it's the one most exposed to people working from home. The hospital lot has demand that doesn't care much about the economy, and it's usually the most expensive to buy for that reason. The commuter lot depends on the transit line staying busy.
I'm not asking which will pay more. I'm asking which demand you'd trust to still be there in ten years, and how that shows up in what you'd pay for the lot today.
Which demand driver would you most want under a first parking asset?
26 votes