If retail would net the heirs more, do you say so on the first call?
I've been sitting in on calls with heirs to learn the language, and the same moment keeps coming up. Somebody asks what the house would sell for on the open market, and there's a real answer that is higher than the cash number.
One view is that you say it plainly. The house might bring more listed, here's roughly what an agent commission and two months of holding would cost, here's what I can pay Friday with no cleanout and no showings. If they choose retail you lose the deal and keep a reputation, and in probate reputation is how the next three attorneys hear your name.
The other view is that you're a buyer, not their advisor, and volunteering a comparison you can't stand behind is its own problem. You don't know the condition behind the locked back bedroom, you don't know what the estate owes, and a number you toss out on a first call becomes the number they anchor to for six weeks. Some people I've talked to say they only discuss retail if the heir raises it, and then they refer to an agent and walk away rather than sell against themselves.
I genuinely don't know which one is the working practice here versus the thing people say out loud. If you're licensed in your state the disclosure rules on that conversation are different, and that varies state to state, so I'm asking about the unlicensed cash buyer version.
On a first call with an heir, do you bring up what the house might bring on the open market?
10 votes