One national tenant on a twelve-year lease, or five local tenants in a small strip?
I've been looking at land and holding patterns for a while and I want something that pays while I wait. Retail keeps coming up, and the two shapes I can actually afford look completely different from each other.
Shape one is a single-tenant net lease building. One national chain, one lease, usually twelve to fifteen years with rent bumps written in. Triple net means the tenant pays the property taxes, the insurance and the maintenance on top of rent, so the checks arrive and there isn't much to do. If that tenant leaves or stops paying, my income is zero until I find a replacement, and I'm one credit decision away from that.
Shape two is a small multi-tenant strip. Five local tenants, maybe a nail salon and a dry cleaner and a taqueria, shorter leases, more turnover. If one leaves I lose a fifth of my rent instead of all of it. But I'm now doing real work, chasing rent, running reconciliations, releasing a bay every year or two, and local tenants have thinner margins than a national one does.
The case for single tenant is that it's genuinely passive and the lease is long. The case for the strip is that the risk is spread and the local rents may be closer to what the market actually supports, so a vacancy reprices at market instead of down from an above-market corporate rent.
I can't tell whether spread risk or contract length is the thing that protects a first-time passive buyer. Voting below and I'd like to hear the reasoning more than the vote.
For a first passive retail purchase, which shape would you buy?
12 votes