Nine notes of rural land paper, and the discount looks too thin
Consider a package from an operator who has been flipping recreational parcels for about six years and wants capital back to buy more. Nine performing notes, total unpaid balance $191,700, average balance $21,300. Coupon on all of them is 9.9%, terms are 84 to 120 months, seasoning ranges from 4 to 26 months. Down payments on origination ranged from 6% to 14% of sale price. Asking price is 72 cents on UPB, about $138,000. A first pass yield to maturity at that price lands near 18% assuming everything pays as agreed, which nothing does. The collateral is the real issue. Every note was originated at a price that included the owner-finance premium, so the parcels were sold at something like 20% to 40% above what a cash buyer would have paid. If three of the nine sit in a county with almost no closed sales to reference, that is a real gap in the ability to price recovery. Taking back a parcel at a balance of $19,000 on ground that cash-sells at $12,000 and takes seven months to remarket puts recovery well under par before the cost of the takeback is even counted. Mixed instruments matter too. Contract for deed in one state and notes with deeds of trust in two others means remedy and timeline differ file by file, which is why counsel in each state should review before closing. The loss assumption is where this kind of deal usually gets decided. A starting point of 15% lifetime default with 55% recovery is a reasonable first pencil, but it should be stress tested against whatever seasoned rural land paper performance data can be found, since assumed numbers on collateral this illiquid deserve real skepticism before capital moves.