How much of the retirement money is too much for one house?
I've been running a service business for five years and the retirement side has been on autopilot in index funds the whole time. Now I'm looking at moving part of it into a self-directed IRA to buy one rental with cash, because the tax-free rent inside a Roth is genuinely attractive to me and I understand rental income better than I understand anything else I own.
The number is where I keep stalling. One house is one asset. If I use most of the account, my retirement is a single roof in a single zip code, plus whatever cash I leave in the account for taxes, insurance, and the custodian's fee. If a tenant stops paying and the furnace goes at the same time, the IRA has to cover it out of its own cash, and I can't just write a personal check to help. I've read that doing so is a prohibited transaction and can blow up the account.
If I only use a small slice, the math gets weak in a different way. A cheap enough property to be a small slice of the account is probably a property that eats management time and doesn't hold value well, and I still pay the same annual custodian fee on it.
So there's a floor and a ceiling and I don't know where either one sits. What share of a retirement account do people here consider defensible in one directly held property?
What share of a retirement account would you put into one directly held property?
16 votes