Carrying a note like this: is the value in the payments or the lump sum
Simple numbers so anyone new can follow. Say a sale at 240,000, the buyer puts 40,000 down, and the seller carries 200,000 at 8.5 percent, amortized over 30 years with a balloon at year seven. The payment works out to about 1,538 dollars a month. Interest in the first year alone runs roughly 16,900, and after 84 payments the balloon balance is still around 186,000, since a 30-year schedule pays down almost nothing early. That structure actually holds two different assets. One is income: 1,538 dollars a month for seven years, secured by the house, with loan to value at creation around 83 percent as the cushion if the borrower stops paying. The only work is banking payments and confirming taxes and insurance stay current. The other is a lump sum. A note buyer purchasing the remaining payments wants a higher yield than 8.5 percent, so they pay less than the balance, and the higher the yield they need, the less cash the seller sees. That trade converts a lender position back into capital available to redeploy. There's a middle structure worth naming: selling a partial, where a buyer takes the next block of payments, say 60 of them, and the note reverts to the original holder afterward. That produces cash now while keeping the tail. None of these three is inherently correct. The right one depends entirely on whether the cash has a better job to do elsewhere at the moment the decision is made.
You just created a $200k seller-financed note. What's the plan going in?
14 votes