Fourplex on residential terms or a six unit on commercial, roughly the same cash in
Two things I've been looking at side by side, both about 40 minutes from me.
One is a fourplex around 540k, four two beds, in place rents 1,250 each. It would be a residential loan, which as I understand it means a longer fixed period and a smaller down payment, and I'd be underwritten partly on my own income. Terms vary by lender and I'd need mine in writing before I trusted any of that.
The other is a six unit at 690k, one bed units, in place rents 850 each. That's a commercial loan by unit count. What I'm told is a higher rate, a shorter term with a balloon, amortization stretched to make the payment work, and the underwriting sits on the building's income rather than mine.
Case for the fourplex: cheaper debt, no balloon date to refinance into whatever rates exist that year, and the option to live in a unit later. Case for the six unit: 30 percent more doors for 28 percent more money, price per unit of 115k against 135k, and one more tenant means one vacancy costs 17 percent of gross instead of 25 percent. The commercial lender also does not care much about my W2, which matters if I change jobs.
People here talk about the residential financing edge on 2-4 units like it settles the argument, and then other people say the real money starts at five units and the debt is just a cost of doing business. I can't tell which of those is a preference and which is arithmetic.
What would decide it for you, and what number would you want to see before you'd cross the four unit line?
Same cash in. Where would you put it?
27 votes