Priced 14 files at $300 flat. Effective rate came out under $22 an hour.
I ran the experiment I'd been talking about for months. Two agents, one small investor, 14 files over about five months, flat $300 per file, paid at close. Nine closed, three fell apart after inspection, two are still open.
I tracked time in six minute increments because I wanted a real number, not a feeling. Median file was 9.4 hours. Mean was 13.1, dragged up by two files that ate 28 and 31 hours. Both of those were the investor's, both were assignments with a lot of party confusion about who signs what, and both closed.
On the nine closed files I collected $2,700. Total tracked hours across all 14, including the three dead ones I got nothing for, was 183. That's $14.75 an hour if you count everything, about $21.90 if you only count the hours on the closed files. Software and e-sign ran me roughly $95 a month, so knock some more off.
The part I got wrong wasn't the rate exactly. I priced a file as if a file were one thing. A straightforward financed resale with a cooperative agent is a five hour file. An assignment where the end buyer's lender wants documents that don't exist yet is a thirty hour file. Same $300.
Second thing: paid at close means the failed files are unpaid labor, and the failed files aren't cheap. My three dead files averaged 7 hours before they died, mostly front-loaded intake and disclosure work.
What I'd change: tiered pricing by file type, an intake fee that isn't contingent on closing, and a written scope for what counts as one file when there are two closings stacked on one property. I'd also stop taking a file type I've never seen at a price I set for a file type I have.