Should a new virtual wholesaler start in their home market or the best market they can find
A common dilemma for new virtual wholesalers is choosing between two shortlisted out-of-state markets with decent price spreads and plenty of listed cash sales, versus starting in an expensive home metro with heavy competition and thin spreads. The case for home first is real. Driving the comps means being able to verify a sold price by walking the street. Meeting buyers in person, asking a title company directly what they will and won't close, and attending a local REIA meeting all compress the learning curve in ways a fully remote start does not. Every mistake stays visible. And there is only one state's rules to learn, which matters, since disclosure and licensing requirements around assigning contracts differ state to state. The case for going straight to the better market is also real. The entire point of remote wholesaling is not being limited by a home zip code. If a home metro's spreads genuinely don't support a target fee, practicing there mostly teaches how to lose politely. And the skill set for a phone-based operation aimed at a distant market is different enough that months of local door knocking do not fully transfer. There is no universal tiebreaker here, but a workable heuristic is this: if the home market has enough spread to close even one or two deals, the in-person feedback loop is usually worth the slower start; if the spreads are genuinely too thin to close anything, going straight to the better market avoids spending months learning a market that was never going to produce.
For a first virtual wholesaling deal, where should someone start?
27 votes