Does the service fee follow the deal or follow the client when the client walks
Started sourcing for a guy in Phoenix, Maricopa County, specific zip codes, 85033 and 85031, single family under $280k, ARV spread of at least 30%. Had a fee structure in place, $4,500 per closed deal. Spent about six weeks building relationships with two probate attorneys and a property manager who feeds me pre-market stuff. Got comfortable with the pipeline. Then the client pivoted, said he was shifting capital to multifamily in Tucson, still wanted me working for him but on a different product type in a different market. No conversation about whether the $4,500 still made sense on a $600k fourplex. He assumed the fee carried over. I assumed we'd renegotiate. Neither of us said it out loud and we lost three weeks on a deal that almost closed before we figured out we had completely different numbers in our heads. What I should have had in the agreement from the start was a clause that tied the fee structure to the deal type and geography, not just to the relationship. If the buy box moves more than one product type or more than one county away from what we originally scoped, we treat it as a new engagement. I have that language now but I wrote it in November after the Tucson thing fell apart. The sourcing relationships I built in west Phoenix are not transferable and the time I spent building them should have had a geographic and product boundary in the original document.