Sourcing for a client who keeps moving the buy box after I already have a property under contract
Happened twice now in the same zip code, 76011, both times the client changed the max ARV he'd accept after I had the seller locked at a number that only worked inside his original parameters. First time I let it go, ate the earnest money, $1,200 out of my own pocket because I didn't want the argument. Second time I pushed back and he said the market shifted and I should understand that. I don't understand it. If the box changes, the deal I sourced inside the old box is still a deal. My agreement says I get the fee at close and there's no language around what happens if he decides mid-contract that he doesn't want the asset anymore. That's the gap I'm staring at right now. I've got another property in that same area, off-market owner, motivated, numbers fit what he told me two weeks ago. I don't want to put it under contract until I figure out whether I need a kill fee clause or something that locks the parameters for a defined window, like 30 days from the date I send him the address. Has anyone actually written that into a sourcing agreement and had it hold up when the client pushed back?