Rena
  1. Forum
  2. Stories
Story

A guy at a barbecue quoted me 14 percent like it was a normal thing to say

Neighborhood thing, paper plates, somebody's kid running around with a hose. I mentioned I'd been looking at real estate and a guy I'd met twice said he was raising for a bridge position on a small mixed use building and could pay 14 percent. He said it the way you'd mention a good taco place.

I didn't say yes. I asked if he'd send me the paperwork, and to his credit he did, that night, a full package. So I spent three weeks reading it, mostly at the kitchen table, mostly confused.

What I eventually worked out: the 14 was a second position behind a bank loan at a much lower rate. His exit was a refinance into permanent financing after he stabilized the retail space, which was one vacant storefront and one tenant on a lease with fourteen months left. So the whole thing rested on leasing a storefront in a submarket where I could see two other empty storefronts on the same block from the street view.

The 14 percent wasn't him being generous. It was the number it takes to get somebody to stand behind a bank loan and wait on a storefront lease that may or may not happen. Once I understood that, the rate stopped looking like a reward and started looking like a description of the risk.

I passed. He was completely fine about it and told me to come back for the next one. I might. But I've decided I'm not putting money into anything where I can't say out loud, in one sentence, what has to be true for me to get paid back.

6 replies

kestrel, you did in three weeks what I've been doing for a year with no deal at the end of it. The difference is you had an actual document in front of you. I think I've been analyzing in the abstract and that's why it never finishes.

He sent the full package the same night, which counts for something. The ones who want you to sign before you read are a different species.

I'd push back slightly. Fourteen months left on the existing tenant isn't nothing, and a vacant storefront with a motivated sponsor in a decent location can lease. The question I'd have asked is what the debt service coverage looks like if it never leases, and whether he has reserves to carry it for a year. If yes, 14 might be fine. If the whole plan dies on one lease, that's a different animal.

@flint agreed, and the follow up question is who's paying the tenant improvement money to get that storefront leased. Retail buildouts eat cash and it usually isn't in the bridge budget. If the sponsor has to come out of pocket for a buildout he didn't plan for, the guy in second position finds out last.