What insurance actually covers on a vacant tower mid-conversion

Question

When an owner group hands off a converted office building post-completion to a property manager, the construction-period documents usually raise questions the manager needs a framework for. During a typical 20 month construction window the building has no occupants, floors stripped to structure, with an existing frame worth significant money sitting inside the work. The policy schedule commonly lists a builder's risk policy with the existing structure valued well below what the building traded for, plus a note about a vacancy provision in the property policy that predates construction. The questions worth answering before taking on management: what covers the existing frame if the building burns at month 14, and whether a code change triggered during construction gets covered under the builder's risk policy or falls to the owner as an upgrade cost. Builder's risk policies vary widely on how they value an existing structure versus new work in place, and vacancy provisions from before construction started do not always carry forward cleanly once the use of the building changes. Both are worth confirming directly with the broker rather than assumed from the schedule alone.

Rena Expert · Accepted Answer

The existing frame is the crux and it's handled differently by different carriers. A builder's risk policy, sometimes sold as course of construction, is written to cover the work in progress. Whether the pre-existing structure is covered depends on whether it was scheduled onto that policy as an insured value, or left on a separate property policy, or excluded altogether. If they listed the existing structure well below what they paid, find out whether that number was meant to be replacement cost of the frame and shell or something else, and whether the policy has a coinsurance clause that would penalize the claim for underreporting. A loss at month 14 involving both completed work and the original frame across two policies is exactly where gaps show up.

The vacancy provision matters before construction starts and sometimes during pauses. Standard property forms cut back or exclude certain perils once a building has been vacant beyond a stated period, commonly 60 days, and vandalism and water damage are usually the first to go. Owners of empty office buildings often need a specific vacant building endorsement or a separate vacancy policy to bridge from acquisition to construction start. Forms and available endorsements differ by carrier and state filings, so get the actual policy language rather than the certificate.

On your code question, that's ordinance or law coverage, and on a reuse project it's more important than on new construction because a mid-project code change or a partial loss can trigger a requirement to upgrade the undamaged portion. It's typically sold in parts covering demolition of the undamaged remainder, the increased cost of construction to current code, and the loss of value of the undamaged part. Absent it, the owner funds the upgrade.

Two more items to pull: soft cost and delay coverage, since a fire that adds nine months adds interest carry and fees that the hard cost limit won't touch, and how abatement work is treated, because pollution and asbestos exclusions frequently sit on both the builder's risk and the liability side. Have their broker confirm all of it in writing.

mitchell_ray4 · Answer

The asbestos point is the one that bites. Once abatement is underway you have a contractor disturbing regulated material, and the general liability the GC carries usually excludes it, so there should be a separate contractors pollution liability policy naming the abatement sub. Ask to see it, not a certificate summary.

tashaford30 · Answer

Is the lender's requirement usually stricter than what the owner would buy on their own? The working assumption would be that the construction lender dictates most of this.

Rena Guide · Answer

To fill in the plain meanings for anyone reading along.

Builder's risk is a temporary property policy covering a building while it's under construction. It covers the materials and the work as it goes up, and it ends when the project is finished or occupied, at which point a normal property policy takes over. On a conversion there's a second question that doesn't exist in new construction, which is who covers the building that was already standing there.

Ordinance or law coverage deals with the fact that building codes change. If an old building suffers a loss, the local authority may require the repair to meet today's code, and may require undamaged parts to be brought up to code as well. A standard policy pays to restore what was there. Ordinance or law coverage pays the extra cost of complying with the current code, and it's usually sold in separate pieces with separate limits.

@tashaford30 lenders do impose insurance requirements in the loan documents, and on construction loans those requirements are often detailed. They protect the lender's collateral, which overlaps with the owner's interest without being identical, so an owner can satisfy a lender and still have exposure. Requirements for contractor licensing and for certain coverages also vary by state, so the specifics have to be confirmed with a licensed broker in the state where the building sits.

aaron_fitz10 · Answer

Twenty months with no rent coming in and a full insurance program running the entire time. Does anyone publish what that carry costs per square foot? It reads like a line that gets glossed over in most conversion pro formas.

renee_dubois · Answer

@aaron_fitz10 The scale is different, but the principle shows up even on a small building. Tell a carrier that a unit will sit empty during a gut and the quote jumps, because vacancy is priced as a risk on its own. On a whole tower for 20 months the premium should be expected to be a serious number, and it does not stop accruing if the project stalls.

luis_carrera · Answer

The item to get in writing before signing a management agreement, @tonyv88, is who insures the building during the handoff, between substantial completion and the first residents. Builder's risk ends on some defined trigger and the permanent property policy starts on another, and those dates do not always meet.

What insurance actually covers on a vacant tower mid-conversion

7 replies