How to read a new conversion overlay on a 22,000 sf building before moving on it
Here is a scenario worth working through carefully before committing capital. The building is a three story former bank and office block on a small city main street, 1962, about 22,000 gross square feet. Ground floor is leased to two tenants paying a combined $4,100 a month on leases with two and four years left. Floors two and three have sat vacant since 2019, last occupied by a title company. Asking $1.1m, about $50 a foot. The city passed an overlay last year that appears to allow residential on upper floors in this district and to reduce the parking requirement for units created out of existing building area. Ordinance language on what triggers the reduction, and whether it applies to a building this old, is often the part that reads two different ways depending on who is reading it. A rough pass on the upper floors: 12 to 14 apartments out of roughly 14,000 feet, at maybe $180 a foot to convert, so $2.5m. Local two bedroom rents run $1,400. Add the ground floor income and the deal gets to maybe $290k of gross rent against $3.6m all in. The practical fork is between paying an architect for a code review and rough test fit, typically a few thousand dollars, or taking the ordinance straight to the planning department and asking directly, which costs nothing but requires being comfortable asking a basic question in front of the people who will approve the project. The second option is usually the better first move, since it is free and often resolves the ambiguity the ordinance text leaves open.