A case study in hiring a second person for a lead desk, and what the middle three months actually look like
Take an operator running a bird dog lead desk who hires one part timer to handle the phone half while they keep doing the sourcing half. Worth posting the numbers because everyone says to hire and nobody says what the middle months look like. Before the hire: one person, roughly 12 accepted leads a month across two clients, about 90 hours of that person's time. After the hire, months one through three: 14, 13, then 16 accepted. Barely moved for two months while the new hire cost 1,400 a month plus a 50 bonus per accepted lead she sourced the conversation on. That is roughly 3,900 cumulative behind by the end of month three, and a natural point to start second-guessing the decision. Month four is where it turns in a case like this. 24 accepted, then 27, then 26. The new hire's per-conversation acceptance rate can pass the original operator's by month five, which is humbling and also the point of hiring somebody who is genuinely better on the phone. Hours drop from 90 to about 55 once the weaker part of the job gets handed off. Revenue can move from around 2,100 a month to 4,600 average over the following three months, against a hire cost of about 2,700 including bonus. Call it net 1,900 better with 35 fewer hours going into it. The part that nearly breaks a case like this is months two and three, not the money but the uncertainty over whether the new hire is improving or whether the hire itself was wrong, because 13 accepted leads a month is too small a sample to show a trend. Logging rejection reasons is what settles it, since a shift from "owner not actually selling" toward "price too high" is a better class of failure and the only real evidence available at that point. What is worth keeping: a bonus per accepted lead, small enough not to distort behavior but big enough that the hire cares which ones get accepted. What is worth changing: budgeting five months of runway instead of three, since three is often not enough patience for something that ends up working. Employment classification for a role like this varies by state, and that question belongs in front of a professional before anyone starts.